A Peer-Reviewed Paper That Finally Tells The Truth??

Published by Pub.med?? Really??

It looks like it. I’m astonished. Once I saw Peter McCullough’s name on the author list, I did a double take.

I found it via this YouTube video by a doctor who advocates for the Keto Diet. Sensational headlines - The biggest crime in the history of medicine. I know what I think the biggest crime is, and I thought she was using this headline to talk about diet. Another wasted opportunity. I had to take a look, to prove myself right. But I was pleasantly surprised. She’s actually talking about the vaccine.

I admit it I have not sat through the whole video of her revelations on the vaccine because I did my research right at the beginning. I even created a website to make it easier for other people to do their research. I called it do-your-research.com. I needed a place to store all the obscure websites and references that I was collecting. It served a purpose for a while, until it became to large to handle, as the evidence was overwhelming as time went on.

So in a way, it was only a matter of time before something was published in an internationally recognised, peer-reviewed journal.

Here is the paper:

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810638/

And from the Abstract:

Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted.

Scientific papers are difficult to read unless you’re used to reading them. So you might prefer to watch the video where this doctor goes through some of their results. Or you might like to read some of the comments on the YouTube video, 5 thousand and counting (the video is 4 days old). The comments could keep you busy for sure. Here are a few of them:

@rocketBTW: I knew this day would come, and I knew when it came they would act like this, unable to admit they were wrong, and quick to censor

@canadiantechprep My wife got the minimum required shots in order to leave Canada to visit her family during "the madness". I refused and had to stay behind. She was diagnosed last week with "aggressive" cancer. 46 years old, non smoker, non drinker, healthy lifestyle. There is no way for me to make a link, but my mind always goes back to the shots and it infuriates me. The politicians and the family members who enforced this can simply ignore, discount, and deny, while we suffer the consequences of their insanity with our loved ones lives. This is so sickening.

@sarahgreear8423 I went from being a celebrated essential worker to complete trash for my decision not to take it. I left healthcare due to this abomination to humanity. “Do no harm”… I’ve lost complete faith in the system.

And my favourite comment of them all, so far:

@maxcarter3413 Dr. Boz, I beg to differ. This is the biggest crime against humanity in the entire history of the Earth.

Watch this space for more. This space, being the world stage.